Utah
AI Policy Overview
Utah enacted a package of AI bills into law in 2024. While not revolutionary, Utah’s legislative package represents a middle ground that most state policymakers are taking on AI regulation. These laws do not establish a comprehensive framework for the development and deployment of AI, but they address pressing issues (deepfakes and consumer protections) and align current laws with the new realities that AI tools represent, with particular emphasis on protecting vulnerable populations and mandating transparency. Utah lawmakers returned in 2025 to clarify and strengthen many of these laws.
In 2024, as part of the AI Policy Act (UT SB 149), lawmakers created and granted regulatory authority to the Office of Artificial Intelligence Policy. That office is tasked with establishing an Artificial Intelligence Learning Laboratory Program. In addition to researching the potential impacts of AI, evaluating current AI policy, and making policy recommendations to the legislature, the program should “encourage the development” of AI in Utah. Finally, the office will oversee and approve temporary safe harbor protections (“mitigation agreements”) for developers, allowing applicants to test AI systems in the state within a limited scope while avoiding some regulatory restrictions.
In June 2023, the Government Operations Interim Committee held a meeting with a presentation on the use of AI in state government. Lawmakers have said to expect bills in the future on "criminalizing some uses of artificial intelligence for public safety and protecting privacy."
Consumer Protections & Transparency
To help protect consumers from AI use, Utah’s AI Policy Act of 2024 (UT SB 149). The law clarifies that the use of an AI system is not a defense for violating the state’s consumer protection laws. And the law requires certain licensed professionals (e.g., mental health providers) to proactively disclose when a consumer is interacting with AI technology while other professionals (e.g., telemarketers) must disclose AI use when asked by the consumer. In 2025, lawmakers extended (UT SB 332) the sunset date of the AI Policy Act to July 1, 2027.
In 2024, Utah enacted a law (UT HB 366) that prohibits a court from relying solely on an algorithm or a risk assessment tool score to make any determination about pretrial release, to determine whether to approve the defendant's diversion to a non-criminal diversion program, or when making any decision regarding probation.
In 2025, Utah followed up on the previous year’s consumer transparency laws with a law (UT HB 452) targeting the mental health industry. The law requires disclosure to the consumer that a mental health chatbot is not human. Another 2025 law (UT SB 180) requires police reports created by AI to include a disclaimer and human review.
Additionally in 2025, lawmakers came back to clarify and strengthen 2024’s AI Policy Act. Utah enacted a law (UT SB 226) requiring that the disclosures of generative AI use by regulated occupations under the AI Policy Act need only be made for “high-risk” interactions. The updated law also requires disclosures by a solicitor using generative AI when asked by a consumer and would apply consumer protection laws to an individual using generative AI.
Deepfakes
Utah passed a series of bills in 2024 aimed at deepfakes and other synthetic media. Regarding sexual deepfakes, lawmakers amended the Sexual Exploitation Act to include computer-generated videos (UT HB 148) and amended the definition of "child sexual abuse material" to include artificially generated content (UT HB 238). Another 2024 law (UT SB 66) amends the definition of “counterfeit intimate image” in the criminal code to include generated images. Utah enacted an additional law in 2025 (UT HB 13) that amends the crime of sexual extortion to include the act of threatening to distribute a counterfeit intimate image.
To limit political deepfakes, lawmakers enacted a bill in 2024 (UT SB 131) to require political advertising containing synthetic media to include a disclosure. The law also allows courts or another sentencing body to consider the use of AI as an aggravating factor in sentencing.
In 2025, Utah enacted a digital replicas law (UT SB 271), which protects digital replicas from unauthorized use. The law expands the scope of what constitutes an abuse of personal identity to include unauthorized commercial use of simulated or artificially recreated personal identities. The law prohibits the distribution of technology primarily designed for the unauthorized creation of content using personal identities for commercial purposes. Additionally, the law includes a fair use exemption.
Facial Recognition
In 2021, the Utah legislature enacted a law (UT SB 34) prohibiting government use of facial recognition technology except in certain circumstances. The law allows facial recognition technology to be used by a law enforcement agency when investigating a felony, a violent crime, or a threat to human life or to identify an individual who is deceased or incapacitated.
In 2024, Utah enacted a law (UT SB 231) that prohibits a governmental entity from obtaining biometric surveillance information without a warrant.
Legislative & Regulatory History
2025 - Utah enacted UT SB 226, which requires that the disclosures of generative AI use by regulated occupations under the AI Policy Act need only be made for “high-risk” interactions and requires disclosures by a solicitor using generative AI when asked by a consumer.
2025 - Utah enacted UT SB 271, which protects digital replicas from unauthorized use.
2025 - Utah enacted UT SB 332, which extended the sunset date of 2024’s AI Policy Act to July 1, 2027.
2025 - Utah enacted UT SB 180), which requires police reports created by AI to include a disclaimer and human review.
2025 - Utah enacted UT HB 452, which requires disclosure to the consumer that a mental health chatbot is not human.
2025 - Utah enacted UT HB 13, which amends the crime of sexual extortion to include the act of threatening to distribute a counterfeit intimate image.
2024 - Utah enacted UT HB 366, which limits a court’s use of an algorithm or a risk assessment tool score in determinations about pretrial release, diversion, sentencing, probation, and parole.
2024 - Utah enacted UT HB 148, which amends the Sexual Exploitation Act to include computer-generated videos.
2024 - Utah enacted UT HB 238, which amends the definition of "child sexual abuse material" to include artificially generated content.
2024 - Utah enacted UT SB 66, which amends the definition of “counterfeit intimate image” in the criminal code to include generated images.
2024 - Utah enacted UT SB 131, which requires political advertising containing synthetic media to include a disclosure.
2024 - Utah enacted UT SB 149, which requires disclosure for generative AI use to protect consumers and creates the Office of Artificial Intelligence Policy.
2024 - Utah enacted UT SB 231, which prohibits a governmental entity from obtaining biometric surveillance information without a warrant.
2021 - Utah enacted UT SB 34, which prohibits government use of facial recognition technology, except in certain circumstances.